This week SAS wrote that open source technology “has its own, often unexpected costs,” recommending organizations maintain a balance of 60% proprietary software to 40% open software. An anonymous reader quotes InfoWorld: How they arrived at this bizarre conclusion is hard to fathom, except that SAS sells more than $1 billion worth of proprietary software every year and presumably would like to continue, despite a clear trend toward open-source-powered analytics… In a Burtch Works survey of over 1,100 quant pros, 61.3% prefer open source R or Python to SAS, and only 38.6% opting for SAS, with that percentage growing for open source options every year. Worse for SAS, a variety of open source data infrastructure and analytics tools threaten to encroach on its bastions in data management, business intelligence, and analytics… Nearly all innovation in data infrastructure is happening in open source, not proprietary software. That’s a tide SAS can try to fight with white papers, but it would do better to join by embracing open source in its product suite. “In the paper, SAS correctly argues that open source versus proprietary software is not an either/or decision…” writes InfoWorld, but they note that the report also “put the percentage of open source adopters at a mere 25%, which is pathetically wrong.” The article suggests a hope that the report “is the product of a rogue field marketing team, and not the company’s official position.” Adobe’s vice president of mobile commented on Twitter, “I just wonder who in their marketing dept thought this was a good idea.”
Read more of this story at Slashdot.