More results...
Organizing events that gather cybersecurity leaders requires significant effort and sponsorships. Unfortunately, some events and communities exclude CISOs who work for security vendors. This stance, though well-meaning, harms the industry and allows hidden conflicts of interest to go unchecked. Here’s why and how we can address this issue to improve such events and the community…
CISA has informed chemical facilities that its Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT) was infiltrated by a malicious actor, and potentially exfiltrated sensitive data
Kaspersky “poses an undue or unacceptable risk to national security,” according to the US Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security
Understanding and preparing for the potential long-tail costs of data breaches is crucial for businesses that aim to mitigate the impact of security incidents
Ransomware group Qilin has reportedly published nearly 400GB of data stolen following the attack on NHS provider Synnovis in early June
Washington says Moscow’s influence over company poses significant risk, as Kaspersky argues its activities do not threaten US securityJoe Biden’s administration has banned Russia-based cybersecurity firm Kaspersky from providing its popular antivirus p…
CISO events often exclude security leaders from cybersecurity vendors to prevent sales pitches, but this overlooks the value these leaders bring and fails to address other potential conflicts. Inclusive events that enforce transparent rules of conduct allow all CISOs to participate, share insights, and grow the industry together.