You have 20/20 vision if you can spot the three differences in the famous painting in under 5 seconds

FIND out if you have perfect vision by spotting the difference in the two semi-identical images from famous paintings.

A few subtle differences can be found in the images below, but only the eagle-eyed can spot the changes.

Painting of a girl wearing a blue and yellow headscarf and a pearl earring.
Jacksons’s Art

The original Girl with the Pearl Earring was painted by Johannes Vermeer c. 1665[/caption]

Painting of a girl with a pearl earring.
Jacksons’s Art

Jackson’s Art team created the modified paintings to train your brain[/caption]

Beat this challenge in under five seconds to be considered an expert with 20/20 vision by noticing the three changes made.

These Spot the Difference puzzles are a great way to test your skills in observation and attention to detail.

Not only is this a fun test for your brain, but doing these brain training exercises also sharpen focus, enhance visual perception, boost memory, and strengthen problem solving skills.

The team of creatives at Jackson’s Art made these puzzles with three of history’s most famous paintings – the ‘Girl with a Pearl Earring’, the ‘Mona Lisa’, and ‘The Starry Night’.

There are three little differences to look out for the in ‘the Girl with a Pearl Earring’ by Dutch artist Johannes Vermeer.

The original of this painting is currently housed in the Mauritshuis in The Hague, Netherlands, and is considered a masterpiece of the Dutch Gold Age.

So have you spotted the three changes that have been made to the original painting?

The differences are subtle, and if you have found then in under five seconds then you have a sharp eye.

If not, no worries, you can scroll down to find the answers.

And if you need to work on your skills, other puzzles like crosswords, Sudoku or those using logic are good.

Artists also made two changes to Leonardo da Vinci’s iconic ‘Mona Lisa’ painting from the early 16th century.

The Mona Lisa has been an significant symbol of Renaissance art, and can be viewed by visiting the Louvre in Paris.

Finally, perhaps the most challenging, you need to find the three differences in Vincent van Gogh’s painting of ‘The Starry Night’.

This well-renowned piece, painted in 1889, is currently viewable at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City and depicted the view from Van Gogh’s asylum room.

For another similar challenge, you can try to find the five hidden changes made to this woman sleeping with a fan picture in under 10 seconds.

Or other brain teasers to spot the rattlesnake in a pile of leaves in less than seven seconds.

The Sun has wide range of optical illusions you can try to stimulate the deepest parts of your brain.

Original portrait of the Mona Lisa.
Jackson’s Art

Original portrait of the Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci[/caption]

Edited version of the Mona Lisa painting, showing the subject wearing a ring.
Jackson’s Art

Edited version of the Mona Lisa painting by Jackson’s Art with two modifications[/caption]

Van Gogh's The Starry Night painting.
Jackson’s Art

Van Gogh’s original painting of The Starry Night[/caption]

Van Gogh's The Starry Night with three changes to the sky and buildings
Jackson’s Art

Changes made to The Starry Night painting by Vincent van Gogh[/caption]

Painting of a girl wearing a blue headscarf and a gold earring.
Jacksons’s Art

Three colour differences to find in the Girl with a Pearl Earring painting[/caption]

Mona Lisa with a ring added to her finger and eyes looking up
Jackson’s Art

The Mona Lisa has had a ring added to her finger, and her eyes are looking up[/caption]

Van Gogh's The Starry Night has two added buildings and a star taken away
Jackson’s Art

One less star to Van Gogh’s The Starry Night, and two extra buildings[/caption]

May 6, 2025
Read More >>

Russia launches deranged attack on UK over VE Day & Putin’s lapdog rages ‘all of Europe marches under Nazi banners’

RUSSIA has launched a furious tirade at Britain as Vladimir Putin’s mouthpieces fume over VE Day commemorations – with wild claims the UK is backing Nazis and plotting to destroy Moscow.

The Kremlin issued an extraordinary insult to British ambassador Nigel Casey, with Russia’s foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova branding him “repugnant” in a fiery blast on state propaganda TV.

Maria Zakharova and Vladimir Putin.
East2West

Putin’s foreign ministry spokeswoman and propagandist Maria Zakharova claims she finds it “repugnant” to look at British ambassador Nigel Casey[/caption]

Military jets fly in formation over Union Jack flags during a VE Day parade.
Getty

A military parade attended by the British Royal Family marked the beginning of the four-day Victory in Europe (VE) Day celebrations in London[/caption]

Vladimir Putin reviewing documents at a meeting.
Reuters

Putin cheerleaders made bizarre claims that the King “gave a standing ovation to Ukrainian Nazis”[/caption]

Sergei Lavrov stating that almost all of Europe is waging war against Russia under Nazi banners.
East2West

Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov alleged that “‘”almost all of Europe is again waging war against us under Nazi banners”[/caption]

She raged to Putin cheerleader Vladimir Solovyov:  “I’m looking at you, because I find it repugnant to look at the British ambassador [Nigel Casey], but I will address him nonetheless.

“Britain continues to pursue the wrong strategy, century after century.

“While they are trying to apply new technological capabilities, using manipulation, schemes, and provocations to once again declare some kind of strategic defeat and attempt to implement it, Russia is moving forward!”

Pretending to address ‘repugnant’ Casey while broadcasting on state propaganda TV, she accused the British of downplaying the role of the Red Army in defeating Hitler while Russia had “quoted Churchill correctly”.

Objecting to the presence of Ukrainian troops at the VE Day commemoration led by King Charles, she said: “They let neo-Nazis march in London while pretending to honour the victory over Nazism.

“That’s not remembrance, it’s betrayal.

“Those marching today…tear down Soviet monuments, exhume honoured soldiers, and now they walk with the British.”

Britain was “a zombified society fed not history, but historical nonsense”.

It was today “training Ukrainians to kill Russians” and earlier during the Russian civil war “set up a concentration camp near Arkhangelsk during the intervention of 1918–1922…over 4,000 people were killed”.

Russia was “grinding down” everything Britain attempted, she claimed.

Despite Putin’s bid to invade and subjugate Ukraine, she claimed: “We are achieving victories, just as we did in the Second World War….

“Russia is leading the global process of international decolonisation, giving countries and peoples the chance to free themselves.”

Illustration of Ukraine front lines showing troop movements and battles.

Russia’s Victory Day

Russia, and the Soviet Union before it, celebrates Victory Day on May 9 every year to commemorate victory in World War Two.

Central to the celebrations is a major military parade in Moscow’s Red Square, during which Russia’s President will give a speech.

However, the date differs in many other European countries, who mark VE Day on May 8 – the day on which Nazi Germany’s unconditional surrender was accepted.

Russia has announced its plans for a three day ceasefire between May 8 and 11, which coincides with the celebrations.

However, Ukraine has been quick to point out that Russia has repeatedly failed to honour previous proposed ceasefires.

Zakharova continued her deranged rant on Telegram, in which she imagined Britain at war with Russia.

She posted: “Both princes [William and Harry] and the king will lead British bankers, designers and, of course, scientists into battle.

“Liz Truss will cover her rear in a tank.

“Boris Johnson will parachute in with British flags in his hands.

“Theresa May will finish everyone off with a dance and tales about ‘Novichok’.”

Solovyov also indulged in this barmy conspiracism, claiming with no evidence that Britain was behind Ukrainian attacks on occupied Crimea.

He ranted: “Who has openly stated they are developing the entire naval drone programme for the Ukrainian nationalists? The British…

“There has not been a single terrorist attack on Russian territory where the involvement of British intelligence was not apparent…

“The heads of the American and British intelligence services sat together and explained how they are overseeing Ukrainian special services.”

He went on to echo the bizarre claim that the King “gave a standing ovation to Ukrainian Nazis.”

The false claim that Ukraine is run by neo-Nazis has been central to Russian propaganda attempting to justify Putin’s brutal invasion of Ukraine.

Solovyov continued his wild rant saying that Britain in the 1930s “welcomed fascists with open arms, and now it trains and celebrates their ideological descendants.”

It comes as the world marks 80 years since VE Day, marking the surrender of Nazi Germany to allied forces in World War Two.

Russia‘s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov added to the outlandish claims that Europe is waging war against Russia under Nazi banners.

“It is very important not only to preserve the memory of the heroes of the…Second World War,” he said.

“But also to remember the diplomatic experience, the diplomatic lessons of those events.

“And these lessons are invaluable, including and especially in the current situation, when almost all of Europe is again waging war against us under arms and, as I have already said, under the Nazi banners.”

Vladimir Solovyov on Russian television.
East2West

Vladimir Solovyov, leading Putin TV propagandist, stepped up its onslaught against London[/caption]

King Charles III and Queen Camilla at a VE Day commemoration.
Getty

King Charles III and Queen Camilla during the military procession to mark the 80th anniversary of VE Day[/caption]

May 6, 2025
Read More >>

The D Brief: 10% fewer generals; ‘Conquer Gaza’; New ICBM expense; ‘Airpower trap’?; And a bit more.

Hegseth orders elimination of 10% of general, admiral jobs. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth took the first step to turn his rhetoric about bloated senior military ranks into policy on Monday with a memo ordering the services to eliminate at least 20 percent of active-duty four-star general and flag officer billets, at least 20 percent of all general officer jobs in the National Guard, and another 10% of general and flag officer billets across the entire military, Defense One’s Meghann Myers reported Monday. 

Hegseth’s order likely amounts to hundreds of positions being eliminated or reduced in rank, including more than 100 generals and admirals and their staffs. Hegseth announced the memo after donning makeup for a two-camera video the Pentagon produced and posted online Monday afternoon. 

Notable: His memo sets no deadline for the services to eliminate the jobs, nor does it direct the services to send him a list of proposed cuts. The Pentagon did not immediately return a request for a list of four-star general billets across the Defense Department’s five services.

As of September 2023, there were 809 active-duty generals and admirals serving in the military, a few dozen below the legal limit of 857. That’s a much lower number than Cold War levels from the 1960s to the 1980s, according to a 2024 Congressional Research Service report, when the military was much larger. “However, while always very small in comparison to the total force, the GFO corps has increased as a percentage of the total force over the past five decades,” the report found. Read more, here

On Tuesday, Hegseth addressed an international group of special operations professionals at the SOF Week event in Tampa, Florida, Defense One’s Patrick Tucker reports on location. Hegseth lauded the SOF community as a model of innovation, one that the rest of the Defense Department should follow, especially in the context of rapid technological development in places like China and Russia. 

“I saw a report this morning on the plane here that demonstrated our enemies are adapting in a matter of hours, not in a matter of years, days, if we’re lucky,” he said, without elaborating on the report. “You adopt advanced technologies early, you make them better, and then you help them spread to the rest of the joint force. You are willing to experiment and fail while learning from each failure and each success,” Hegseth said in his remarks Tuesday.

Hegseth also touched on the broad international partnerships that U.S. special operations established with partner militaries, which the Pentagon chief said “pays huge dividends on our border in the Indo-Pacific and around the world.” 

He also hinted at an undefined role for U.S. special operations in Panama amid talk of “tak[ing] back the Panama Canal from Chinese influence,” which he called “a strategic prerogative” and “special operations plays a large role in it.” Hegseth, however, did not touch on the role that other government entities play in maintaining those partnerships, nor how they may be affected by diplomatic tensions caused by various White House moves pressuring the Panamanian and other governments.

“Harnessing our partnerships gives us strategic and tactical advantage, achieving peace through strength,” Hegseth told his audience Tuesday.

Additional reading:Hegseth Used Multiple Signal Chats for Official Pentagon Business,” the Wall Street Journal reported Monday.  

ICYMI: The commander of U.S. Special Operations Command has concerns. “In a not-so-distant future, the United States may face a combination of National Defense Strategy competitors in a shooting war while still holding terrorist groups at bay and responding to yet more crises across the globe. It is not difficult to imagine a scenario in which things go badly, quickly.” But Army Gen. Bryan Fenton also has a vision for a broad partnership that could turn things around. Read about it in his op-ed for Defense One, here.


Welcome to this Tuesday edition of The D Brief, a newsletter dedicated to developments affecting the future of U.S. national security, brought to you by Ben Watson, Bradley Peniston and Patrick Tucker. Share your tips and feedback here. And if you’re not already subscribed, you can do that here. On this day in 1937, the German airship Hindenburg caught fire and crashed while attempting to dock in New Jersey. 

More from the Pentagon

New ICBMs likely can’t reuse old silos, Air Force now says. Ever since the program now called Sentinel began nearly a decade ago, the service has assumed that it could reuse the hundreds of silos that emplace the current Minuteman III missiles across the American West. “Shockingly enough, if we look at it [now], that may not be the answer,” Air Force Global Strike commander Gen. Thomas Bussiere said on April 30.

The news arrives after the Air Force attempted to convert an old silo at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. “While no decision has been made, we expect Sentinel to use predominantly [Air Force]-owned real estate to build new missile silos instead of re-using MMIII silos,” a service spokesperson said in a statement Monday. The service had no immediate word on how much expense that would add to a program that is already more than one-third over budget.

How did this happen? “I would say, at best it comes down to mismanagement and incompetence, and at worst, an intentional effort to downplay the complexities and challenges of the Sentinel program to make it appear like it would be the cheaper, easier option over just extending the service life of the current force,” said Mackenzie Knight, a senior research associate for the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists. Defense One’s Audrey Decker has more, here.

Additional reading:

Israel-Gaza

Update: After 19 months of war, the Israeli military now says it wants to “conquer Gaza” and hold the Palestinian territory, the Times of Israel reported Monday. “The plan is gradual and focuses at first on a certain, unspecified area within the Strip, before expanding to other places” over a process expected to take several more months of fighting. 

At least 59 hostages are believed to still be held in Gaza, “including at least 35 who have been confirmed dead,” the Times of Israel reports. “They were among 251 abducted on October 7, 2023, when Hamas led over 5,000 terrorists to invade southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and triggering the war.”

Israel’s military will also call up tens of thousands of reservists for the job, the Associated Press reports, while also cautioning that the plan “may be another measure by Israel to try to pressure Hamas into making concessions in ceasefire negotiations.”  

ICYMI: “Israel cut off Gaza from all imports in early March, leading to dire shortages of food, medicine and other supplies. Israel says the goal is to pressure Hamas to free the remaining hostages,” AP reports. Meanwhile, “Aid organizations have warned that malnutrition and hunger are becoming increasingly prevalent in Gaza.” 

Developing: Israel’s military attacked Yemen’s main airport in the capital city of Sana’a after warning citizens nearby to evacuate the area, the Israeli Defense Forces announced on social media. 

Targeted: “Houthi terrorist infrastructure,” the IDF said, describing the strikes as a “response to the attack launched by the Houthi terrorist regime against Ben Gurion Airport” on Sunday. 

According to the IDF, “The [Sana’a] airport served as a central hub for the Houthi terrorist regime to transfer weapons and operatives, clearly underscoring the Houthi terrorist regime’s brutal exploitation of civilian infrastructure. Furthermore, several central power plants were struck in, and surrounding, the Sana’a area. These plants were exploited by the Houthi regime for energy infrastructure and for the construction of underground tunnels.”

By the way: The Houthis managed to slip a missile through Israeli and U.S.-made air defense systems in that Sunday attack on Ben Gurion, the Times of Israel reported. Reuters and AP have more from the Israeli response Tuesday. 

Another thing: The U.S. military “likely bombed a migrant detention center in Yemen on April 28,” the New York Times reported over the weekend after analyzing post-strike footage. “At least three U.S.-made GBU-39 bombs” were discovered “at the site of the attack, which killed 68 African migrants, according to the Houthis.” More, here.

Commentary: In Yemen, Trump risks falling into an “airpower trap.” The administration’s ongoing attempt to “completely annihilate” the Houthis through airpower is more likely to lead to an expanded war and even a quagmire, if history is any guide, writes Charles Walldorf of Wake Forest University. “U.S. presidents such as Lyndon Johnson, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama all fell into this trap. In Vietnam, the Balkans and Syria, respectively, all ended up with far bigger wars than they bargained for, with consequences for civilian casualties, international peace, and damage to America’s reputation abroad,” Walldorf writes, here.

Trump 2.0

Are there legal limits to the U.S. military’s border activities? Thousands of active-duty troops are now performing missions along the Mexican border that go far beyond the usual support for the Border Patrol, NPR notes: “Among the most significant developments came last month, when Trump designated a 170-mile stretch of federal land along the southern border — which spans through California, Arizona, and New Mexico — as a military installation, or a national defense area. On Thursday, the Department of Defense announced that a second section in Texas will be marked as a military installation. At least 82 people have been federally charged for ‘unauthorized entry’ into the newly created National Defense Area in New Mexico as a result.”

NPR explores how these and other actions comport with federal laws designed to limit the use of federal troops on American soil. Read that, here.

Additional reading: 

Etc. 

Lastly today, a hearty congratulations to Edda Fields-Black of Carnegie Mellon University for her epic 2024 book, Combee: Harriet Tubman, the Combahee River Raid, and Black Freedom During the Civil War, which received the Pulitzer Prize for History on Monday. 

The book is a detailed account of a daring U.S. Army operation led by Tubman in 1863 that took three gunboats up South Carolina’s shallow Combahee River to free more than 700 enslaved people working on rice plantations in Confederate territory. Four years ago, Fields-Black spoke to us about her then-developing book on our Defense One Radio podcast. Read more at the Pulitzer website, here

]]>

May 6, 2025
Read More >>