Hello everyone,

I currently run a small home/office setup based on a Unifi infrastructure (PoE switches and APs). Integration has always been my priority, but now I need to expand by adding a video surveillance system.

I’m torn between two main options and I’m looking for advice, especially from those who have experience running both systems on Unifi networks:

Option 1: Sticking with Unifi Protect

Pros: Full integration, single management interface (UDM), existing PoE wiring, no need for extra recording hardware if I use the UDM. Cons/Concerns: Unifi camera cost (tends to be higher) and less variety in models (e.g., mid-range PTZ lenses or cameras with affordable optical zoom).

Option 2: Adopting Reolink (which is the only one cam I currently use)

Pros: Cameras offer excellent value for money, a huge variety of models (PTZ, zoom, 4K), and the option to use a separate, more flexible NVR (e.g., a dedicated Reolink NVR or a NAS with third-party software like Surveillance Station). Cons/Concerns:

1. Compatibility/Integration: How “disruptive” is a Reolink system on a Unifi network? Are there any known issues with traffic, configuration, or stability?
2. Traffic Management: I’d manage the Reolink cameras’ video stream on a separate VLAN. Is there a risk of them somehow congesting the UDM or the network?
3. App Overload: Having to manage two separate apps (Unifi Network and Reolink/NVR) for my smart home devices.

My priority is reliability and functionality at a good price point. Since I already have the Unifi ecosystem, is it really worth “stepping outside” with Reolink to save money and gain more model options? Or does Protect’s integration offer superior value that justifies the extra cost?

Thanks in advance for your advice and shared experiences!