Veritas Reporter Christian Hartsock Interviews MI State Reps Seeking Answers To Viral Pfizer Videos #DoSomething #HelpExposeCorruption #InvestigativeReporting #JamesO’Keefe #ProjectVeritas #MaryPatriotNews

Donate: https://www.projectveritas.com/donateGet emails: https://confirmsubscription.com/h/j/EC8A17570A033FCCFollow:Telegram: https://t.me/project_veritasFB: https://www.facebook.com/ProjectVeritasIG: https://www.instagram.com/project_veritas/Telegram: https://t.me/JamesOKeefeIIIIG: https://www.instagram.com/jamesokeefeiii/Mission StatementInvestigate & expose corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions in order to achieve a more ethical & transparent society.Core ValuesMORAL COURAGE – Courage is the virtue that sustains all others. We choose to overcome our fears.WE ARE ALL LEADERS – Turning people into leaders. Completed staff work. Ownership.COLLABORATION – Best not to work in silos. No one individual is as smart as all of us.RESILIENCE – Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. Never, ever, ever give up. We don’t let mistakes or setbacks discourage us. Pursue perfection, knowing full well you will never attain it.MISSION DRIVEN – The best people are motivated by purpose. We are passionate and truly believe in our cause. We must be externally focused, not internally focused.MAKE THE STATUS QUO DO THE IMPOSSIBLE – We move mountains. Failure is not an option. We do whatever it takes.THE TIP OF THE SPEAR – We are a loss leader. We do not shy away from conflict or litigation.Ethical ValuesRule #1 – Truth is paramount. Our reporting is fact based with clear and irrefutable video and audio content. Truth is paramount. We never deceive our audience. We do not distort the facts or the context. We do not “selectively edit.”Rule #2 – We do not break the law. We maintain one-party consent when recording someone is inherently moral and ethical. We never record when there is zero-party consent. In areas where we are required to have consent from all parties, we seek legal guidance regarding the expectation of privacy’s impact on our right to record.Rule #3 – We adhere to the 1st Amendment rights of others. During our investigations we do not disrupt the peace. We do not infringe on the 1st Amendment rights of others.Rule #4 – The Zekman Test. The undercover investigations we pursue are judged by us to be of “vital public interest” and “profound importance.” The Zekman Test is our baseline. Undercover investigative reporting is necessary because, “…there’s no other way to get the story…” Whereas the Society of Professional Journalists allows for undercover techniques, if undercover techniques are necessary to expose issues of vital public importance; we believe they are not only allowed but required.Rule #5 – We Protect the Innocent When Possible – Embarrassing private details are not to be investigated. We stay away from irrelevant embarrassingly intimate details about private citizens personal lives. We look for individual wrong-doing and judge its public importance. The irrelevant religious or sexual dispositions of our targets are not to be investigated.Rule #6 – Transparency. Our methods & tactics must be reasonable and defensible. We use the “Twelve Jurors on Our Shoulder” rule. The work has to be done with such a degree of integrity that it can withstand scrutiny in both law & ethics. We are comfortable with transparency. We must be willing to be ready to disclose our methods upon publication.Rule #7 – Verifying and Corroborate Stories – Evaluate impact on third parties and Newsworthiness of Statements Alone.We consistently consider the probable truth or falsity of statements, examine any reasons to doubt the veracity of underlying assertions and whether the assertions are newsworthy. When possible, we will confirm with our subjects that their statements captured on video are accurate & truthful. At the very least, we will give our subjects an opportunity to elaborate and/or respond. In all matters, we rely on the 1st Amendment to protect our ability to publish newsworthy items after our internal deliberations. On whether there is an obligation to ensure the veracity of statements made on video, 1.) consider whether the remarks may potentially impact an innocent third party. (Factors in support of releasing the content) and 2.)The Newsworthiness of the statement alone by itself. (Factors against releasing the content).Rule #8 – Raw Video. In certain circumstances we may release the “raw” video to the press and or the public. But as a rule, we do not.Rule #9 – Subject Anonymity. We investigate & question sources before promising anonymity. Once we confirm, we will do everything in our power to protect the identity of our confidential sources.Rule #10 – Being Accountable. Admit mistakes & correct them promptly.Rule #11 – We do not manufacture content. We do not put words in our investigative subjects’ mouths. We do not lead the horse to water. Our purpose is to elicit truth.Rule #12 – With Great Power comes Great Responsibility.

February 17, 2023
Read More >>

MAJOR Legal Win For Pro-Lifers #ACLJ #AmericanCenterForLawAndJustice #JaySekulow #OfficialACLJ #RadioRecap #SCOTUS #Sekulow #MaryPatriotNews [Video]

SIGN: Defend Pro-Lifers from Attack: https://aclj.org/pro-life/defend-pro-life-kids-defending-babies-from-radical-attack?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=YouTube&utm_campaign=RecapDescriptionVisit Our Website: https://www.aclj.org/?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=YouTube&utm_campaign=RecapDescriptionSubscribe to Our Channel: https://aclj.us/youtubeRequest Our Legal Assistance: https://aclj.org/help?utm_medium=Video&utm_source=YouTube&utm_campaign=RecapDescriptionWe’ve got our first big victory to announce in our lawsuit against the National Archives (NARA) for harassing and kicking out pro-life visitors after the March for Life in Washington, and it was a very swift win at that. The government has just agreed to enter into a consent order and preliminary injunction, which will stop NARA from targeting pro-lifers again. We told you how we filed two different lawsuits – one against the Smithsonian and the other against NARA – for targeting and harassing pro-lifers, including kids and grandparents. Now we’ve obtained our first win in the NARA case, where a grandmother (our client) and her granddaughter were told to cover up or else remove their pro-life shirts – imagine someone telling your grandmother that in a public, federally funded museum. It’s inexcusable. As we stated in our complaint: “Defendants unlawfully deprived Plaintiffs of their First Amendment rights to engage in protected speech and expression in violation of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.Defendants’ restriction on Plaintiffs’ speech is content and viewpoint-based and demonstrates a concerted effort to single out, embarrass, intimidate, exclude, and ultimately silence the message expressed by Plaintiffs in wearing their “pro-life” clothing and other attire. . . . Defendants knew, or reasonably should have known, that their conduct would violate Plaintiffs’ federal constitutional rights.”But that wasn’t the only action we took, as we explained on ACL.org: “Following the filing of the lawsuit, our legal team immediately went to work preparing a motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prohibit Defendants from engaging in the same conduct again throughout the duration of the lawsuit. A restraining order and/or injunction is necessary here because two of our clients have plans to return to the National Archives soon – one as early as the end of this week – and we want to ensure that they are not targeted, humiliated, and silenced again during their visits.”Now the government has agreed to enter into a consent order requiring them to allow pro-lifers into their facility without issue and to provide every security officer and other visitor-facing employee with a copy of the consent order. And as we demanded, NARA also has to apologize to our client for the stress and humiliation that was inflicted upon her and her granddaughter. We’ve continually told you how the radical Left worships at the altar of abortion. Attacking kids, students, and grandparents, let alone any pro-life individuals or groups, is just the latest demonstration of the radical Left’s depravity when it comes to pushing its extreme anti-Life agenda. This is a big win and a clear message to the Deep State: Leave pro-lifers alone. Now NARA can’t harass or throw out anyone for being pro-life, but the case is not over. We’re taking the Deep State to court to find out where the order to target and remove pro-lifers came from and who else knew about it. This is just one of many coordinated efforts to harass and abuse pro-lifers in federally funded institutions. That directive came from someone, and whoever it was must be held accountable. Today’s full Sekulow broadcast includes further analysis of this consent order, this particular case, and our lawsuit against the Smithsonian for the same targeted harassment of pro-lifers. We’re also joined by several special guests, including Sen. Marsha Blackburn, Rep. Claudia Tenney, and ACLJ Senior Counsel for Global Affairs Mike Pompeo.

February 17, 2023
Read More >>